Regulatory Evidence Locker
Regulatory evidence you can prove was unaltered, with a chain of custody your auditors can follow.
The problem
/ 01Regulatory evidence is only useful if it can be proven unaltered and its chain of custody reconstructed. Generic storage provides neither.
What it does
/ 03Seals regulatory documents with immutable audit trail.
Unseals evidence for review under NDA.
Supports chain-of-custody tracking for compliance.
Private pilot adds
/ pilotPilot-ready: durable evidence-locker store available under NDA with a /v1 API for private pilots. The public studio card runs against /demo (ephemeral).
Who it’s for
/ 03- Legal and compliance teams managing regulatory requests
- Organizations under audit that must show evidence integrity
- Teams that need NDA-controlled review workflows
In context
/ 01Sits alongside the Private Contract Vault (contracts) and the Cross-Platform Audit Bridge (event intake) — the same seal-and-verify discipline across document types.
Spec & limits
/ limits| Interface | Input limits | Output artifact | Failure mode | Non-claim |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Studio ephemeral /demo; pilot durable /v1 on your infrastructure. | TBD — verified in pilot acceptance | TBD — verified in pilot acceptance | TBD — verified in pilot acceptance | TBD — verified in pilot acceptance |
Related guide
/ guideSee the evidence custody guide for a deeper problem walkthrough and verification notes — evaluation notes for the live demo and for a private pilot. Also: try the live experiment and read the product overview.
Frequently asked questions
/ 0501 How is the chain of custody reconstructed from a sealed item?
Each sealed item carries a hash-chained receipt of every touch — store, move, review, export — so the full chain is reconstructable from the item itself.
02 What stops an insider from altering the stored evidence?
Items are sealed with an integrity hash and an audit receipt; any alteration breaks the seal and is detectable on the next verification.
03 Can evidence be reviewed under NDA without unsealing?
Yes — review is mediated through the sealed interface with access logging; the underlying item is not exposed in the clear to reviewers.
04 How are retention and disposal governed?
A retention schedule binds to the item’s receipt; disposal emits a separate attestation that the item was purged from all stores.
05 Is this a replacement for a full e-discovery platform?
No — it is a custody and chain-of-custody layer, not an e-discovery suite or case-management system.